IQ.wiki

Read

Edit

History

Notify

Share

Ryan Zarick

Ryan Zarick is the CTO and co-founder of , a cross-chain interoperability platform that enables developers to create that work seamlessly across multiple . [1]

Education

Zarick graduated from the University of New Hampshire with a BS in Computer Science in 2009 and an MS in Computer Science in 2011. As a student, he worked in the UNH InterOperability Lab as a tester and a graduate research assistant alongside and Caleb Banister. [1]

Career

At UNH, Zarick co-founded Coder Den, a software consulting firm, with and Banister. After graduation, he served as CTO of Buzzdraft, an online fantasy sports website, until March 2013. In January 2018, he co-founded 80Trill, a writing, testing, and auditing company, where he worked until March 2020. He also co-founded Minimal AI with , and in February 2021, they co-founded . [1]

Interviews

LayerZero & Stargate

In an interview with White Crypto at 2023, Zarick discussed his background and bridge. The interview opened with Zarick’s background: [2]

“My three co-founders, , Caleb, and I, were college roommates, and we started our first company out of school together. We built and sold that company, and then have been building products and companies together for the past 16 years. Before , we were doing AI research with Nome Brown and Facebook AI Research that we had published. It was cutting-edge AI research with performance 5000x over the industry best, done by Google DeepMind and Facebook at the time. We then moved into and wanted to build products there. We played around with early arbitrage opportunities on-chain. When , or , came out, it was a viable option to compete with . There was a lot of traction, and we thought it would be awesome to make a multi-chain application, so that's what we aimed to do.”

“So I started evaluating all the bridges and messaging layers, but there weren't any messaging layers at the time, just bridges, and realized they were all deeply flawed. They all relied on having a middle chain with some consensus that was in some way. If it was , you could stake a couple hundred million, but as it gets more popular, you need more money , which becomes very capital inefficient. If you're securing billions, you also need billions , and if you don't have that, it's just a honeypot. In the same way, you would expect to be attacked if a was cost-effective, but it's not. It will become very cost-effective for middle chains over time as they gain popularity to be attacked because they will be securing way more than their bonding.”

He then explained how and worked: [2]

“One of the other concepts we liked but was really expensive was the Cosmos IBC style, where you're running full light clients and then validating with transaction proofs. The problem with that is it would cost 50 to 100 million dollars per day per pairwise chain attached to , so it really only worked with the chain and the ecosystem due to cost constraints. That's when we came up with , which takes an approach of running what we call an ultra-light or an ultra-light client, moving block headers on demand, and then validating them on the destination chain. This is how we got to , creating that messaging layer, and then we built on top of that, which is a native asset bridge that is fully composable. Things like Sushi X Swap by , where you can go from any asset to any asset on any chain with a single click, are enabled by and this composable native asset bridge.”

When asked about security, Zarick responded: [2]

“Security is our number one concern. We spend more money than anybody in the space on audits, with three and a half million dollars this year alone on 25 audits and counting. We continuously get audits on things that are out there, even after release, and we engage as many white-hat auditors as possible to try to attack and break our systems. We have the largest bug bounty in all of crypto, with both and each offering 15 million dollars, totaling 30 million dollars in bug bounties. Additionally, we're getting and formally verified. Security is our highest priority.”

“The base design of ensures it is a true protocol, independent of me or for its security. I coded and designed it so that even if I wanted to attack , I couldn't. There's nothing I or can do to affect applications building on top of it because it is a decentralized and permissionless protocol. It is not upgradable, meaning we can't push updates that could potentially break or risk applications building on top of us. This contrasts with many bridge hacks, like the recent Nomad one, where an upgrade failure allowed forged messages, and bug bounty incident, where an upgrade oversight was caught by a white hat. This highlights the fundamental flaw of not prioritizing security and having upgradable systems.”

Panels

Cross-Chain Security

Zarick's presentation on cross-chain security emphasized the necessity of robust cross-chain messaging protocols for applications. He highlighted the importance of composability among applications across different , noting that no single chain can meet all application needs. Zarick detailed the risks associated with cross-chain messaging, such as client diversity, upgradeability, and user application vulnerabilities, and explained how mitigates these through immutable and optional library upgrades. He also introduced a security feature called "pre-crime," which allows applications to define invariants that prevent potential hacks during the asynchronous messaging process. [3]

Omnichain Security

Zarick presented “Pre-Crime: The Future of Omnichain Security” at the Security Summit 2022. He focused on two primary risks: protocol upgrade risk and user application risk. He highlighted how upgrades can reset their security, making systems vulnerable, and emphasized the dangers of bugs in user applications built on messaging infrastructures. To mitigate these risks, introduced "Library upgrades," allowing applications to opt-in to new updates at their discretion, and "Pre-Crime," a technology that preemptively simulates and validates transactions on chains to prevent exploits. These approaches aim to enhance security and reliability in cross-chain communication. [4]

The Multichain Future

“The Multichain Future” panel at Singapore 2022 discussed the future of a multi-chain ecosystem, highlighting the importance and challenges of interoperability between different networks. Key speakers included Zarick from , who explained protocol for cross-chain communication, and from , who introduced their system. The conversation covered the trade-offs between different chains regarding speed, security, and use cases and the potential evolution toward applications operating across multiple chains. from Fabric Ventures emphasized the need for clear use cases and the ongoing uncertainty in predicting which multi-chain configurations will dominate. The panel underscored the early stage of this technology and the importance of developing flexible, user-friendly solutions that can adapt to the emerging landscape. [5]

See something wrong? Report to us.

Ryan Zarick

Commit Info

Edited By

Edited On

July 25, 2024

Feedback

Average Rating

Based on over 1 ratings

How was your experience?

Give this wiki a quick rating to let us know!

Twitter Timeline

Loading...

Loading

Media

REFERENCES

Join the IQ Brainlist

Sign up for the IQ Brainlist to get access to editing on the IQ.wiki site!

Join Now

Subscribe to our newsletter

The IQ Ecosystem Report will keep you updated on everything IQ.

Subscribe

IQ.wiki

IQ.wiki's vision is to bring blockchain knowledge to the world and knowledge onto the blockchain. A part of Brainfund group

https://twitter.com/IQWIKIhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Everipedia/https://t.me/everipediahttps://www.instagram.com/iqwiki_/https://github.com/EveripediaNetworkhttps://discord.gg/x9EWvTcPXthttps://www.facebook.com/iqdotwiki

IQ

What's IQ?StakingBonds

Company

About usCareersWe're hiringBrandingIQ GPTIQ Dashboard

© 2024 IQ.wiki Powered By BrainDAO & IQ